NHSE448 Primary Care Services (Medical and Nursing) including Clinical Substance Misuse for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange and Integrated Mental Health Services including Neurodiveristy and Psychosocial Substance Misuse Services for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange

Description

North of England Commissioning Support (NECS) is a commissioning support service working for and on behalf of NHS England North East and Yorkshire (the Relevant Authority) Health and Justice Team, who undertook a competition to provide Primary Care Services (Medical and Nursing) including Clinical Substance Misuse for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange and Integrated Mental Health Services including Neurodiversity and Psychosocial Substance Misuse Services for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange under the NHS Standard Contract. Lot 1: Primary Care Services (Medical and Nursing) including Clinical Substance Misuse for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange North of England Commissioning Support (NECS) is a commissioning support service working for and on behalf of NHS England North East and Yorkshire (the Relevant Authority) Health and Justice Team, who undertook a competition to provide Primary Care Services (Medical and Nursing) including Clinical Substance Misuse for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange under the NHS Standard Contract. (Ref NHSE448) Services were to be delivered in Lots: Lot 1 Primary Care Services (Medical and Nursing) including Clinical Substance Misuse for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange; The maximum annual contract value was: Lot 1 £3,110,093 This was a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Contract Notice. The awarding of this contract was subject to the Healthcare Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Regulations 2024 (Procurement Act 2023) did not apply to this award. The contract term was for an initial period of 5 years commencing on 01 April 2026, with an option to extend for a further 3 years at the discretion of the Relevant Authority and subject to satisfactory contractual and financial performance. The closing date for submission of competition response was by 12 noon, 11 August 2025. Additional information: The Provider Response Document included the contract award criteria, including the agreed relative importance of key criteria (for example weightings apportioned to questions within the key criteria) against which responses would have been evaluated. The providers would have been assessed against the relevant 5 key criteria and mandatory requirements. Lot 2: Integrated Mental Health Services including Neurodiversity and Psychosocial Substance Misuse Services for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange North of England Commissioning Support (NECS) is a commissioning support service working for and on behalf of NHS England North East and Yorkshire (the Relevant Authority) Health and Justice Team, who undertook a competition to provide Integrated Mental Health Services including Neurodiversity and Psychosocial Substance Misuse Services for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange under the NHS Standard Contract. (Ref NHSE448) Services would have been delivered in Lots: Lot 2 Integrated Mental Health Services including Neurodiversity Services for HMP New Hall and HMP Askham Grange The maximum annual contract value was: Lot 2 £2,943,649 This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Contract Notice. The awarding of this contract was subject to the Healthcare Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Regulations 2024 (Procurement Act 2023) did not apply to this award. The contract term was for an initial period of 5 years commencing on 01 April 2026, with an option to extend for a further 3 years at the discretion of the Relevant Authority and subject to satisfactory contractual and financial performance. The closing date for submission of competition response was by 12 noon, 11 August 2025. Additional information: The Provider Response Document included the contract award criteria, including the agreed relative importance of key criteria (for example weightings apportioned to questions within the key criteria) against which responses would have been evaluated. The providers would have been assessed against the relevant 5 key criteria and mandatory requirements.